Mike Dean, aka "nullified" aka "Barney Rubble" aka "Doug Baiter" aka numerous other sockpuppets, has been trolling the alt.www.webmaster newsgroup for over six years. He goes to great lengths to defend spammers against what he believes is "unfair" spamcopping by the regulars of AWW who report people for posting advertising.

The following messages are probably the most egregious thing he has ever done; attacking a man personally and his business with false allegations of child molesting:

nullified <null@null.null> wrote in message:
sg64a3160o7ojb9etb6g7rem7f8tmp95bg@4ax.com,
Subject: Beware JDS Computer Training Corp.
> The proprietor is a convicted child molester

From: Nullified <null@null.null>
Newsgroups: alt.www.webmaster
Message-ID: <v9kii2l9djqvo7gpju8ufqsspt7hsum96r@4ax.com>
Well you ARE a paedophile and a pervert, Jerry. Do I have to remind
you each post? Have you forgotten what youve done? 
It doesnt make you mad? Hehehe, okay Jerry, whatever you say. See, I
cant lose here. Either it upsets you to be named as something so
reviled as a child molester, or you have such a sick and twisted
mentality that it doesnt worry you for others to say such of you. Of
course, I have no way of knowing and I wouldnt want to guess. But hey,
Jerry, for the sake of your future self-respect, I seriously hope it
isnt the latter. Anyone who genuinely doesnt care when someone calls
him a pervert would be in serious need of genuine medical help

From: Nullified <null@null.null>
Newsgroups: alt.www.webmaster
Message-ID: <qknii2llqk1upnrv4cs2i786b281kgln4e@4ax.com>
Well Jerry, further up this same post youve asked where my bit about
Paedo and Pervert are. Then, further down the post, youve said Ah here
they are. You cant have it both ways, Jerry. Either youre okay with me
posting it or you arent. 
Oh, and by the way. I noticed the complete lack of reply to my para
about whether it bothers you. Can you not answer that? If it bothers
you, Im glad. I dont like being called a spammer either, because (a)
Im not and (b) I hate them. If it DOESNT bother you then you need some
help, as I cant think of a man on the planet that wouldnt be grossly
offended by that, unless of course he *was* a closet paedophile

-------------------
Here is how Mike Dean defends his false accusations of pedophilia:

From: Nullified <null@null.null>
Newsgroups: alt.www.webmaster
Subject: Re: 2 GB for free online backup
Message-ID: <mlrhk2p0aaso2f5q2ugi6idms0em5kqogp@4ax.com>
If he could back off his statement that he knows to be wrong, he'd find less
allegations of paedophilia. 

-----------------
Mike Dean has been stalking me ever since I publicly identified him so that he could no longer make his false allegations of child molesting anonymously. Since then he has been digging through my posting history in every newsgroup I've ever frequented, looking for anything he can lie about.

An example of how much effort Mike Dean the stalker puts into doing research on one of his targets and then lying about what he has found:

nullified <null@null.null> wrote in message:
ngqnc3lcee2u384fg231nd9sahgaejhcdt@4ax.com,
> Just wondering... if your ability with web encoding is at a FrontPage
> level, and runs to 'building' nothing more than a collection of single
> page static domains, BUT you sell your children and buy a generic, off
> the peg, pillz site, well does that qualify you as a webmaster?

Mike Dean is a stalker for doing the amount of research it would take to uncover that I bought a domain name over seven years ago, and a Kook for lying about it, by claiming that I bought the the associated web site when I didn't--not to mention his totally insane claim that I "sell" my children.

As for his other assertions; I earn a very good living from over 30 web sites, with a combined total of several hundred (perhaps over 1,000) pages, so that should qualify me as a webmaster. 

Mike Dean is a hobbyist webmaster and from the looks of it, his one site probably doesn't even earn enough to cover the hosting.

---------------------

Mike Dean began stalking me in the webmaster newsgroup and it wasn't long before he followed me to the chronic pain support group to pursue his stalking there as well:

nullified <null@null.null> wrote in message:
skmjc3pnr7prqt1q3qqcmqrjd6dr5fiomd@4ax.com,
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:42:46 -0700, "Juba" <juba@XmasterjubaX.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Heh
>> Sounds like this shrink is a mental case. :-)
>
> Yeah, you're right. Sell him some pillz from your 'no scrip' store,
> eh?

-----------------------------

Mike Dean is fond of making false spam complaints to "punish" people who spamcop others for real spam. Here he is, bragging about spamcopping someone for what he calls a "spam sig" but what is in reality a sig that conforms entirely to USENET conventions:

From: nullified <null@null.null> 
Newsgroups: alt.www.webmaster,uk.net.web.authoring 
Subject: Re: Dreamhost 
Message-ID: <f0jvq2ptfh4evckbjsaq9u9h3kobogbacn@4ax.com>
By the way, I've not only complained about your spam sig to your host, but will try to
maintain sufficient interest in your unworthy dribble to point it out
to all those you kop too - lets see how much your host trusts you

----------------------
Mike Dean admits to using multiple sockpuppets:

nullified <null@null.null> wrote in message:
k3vlc3t8crk64ing5t2o619nbqdr9it9jj@4ax.com,
> the other names I use in here are not in
> any way controversial.

It is not uncommon for a Kook who is being ignored to attack himself with his own sockpuppet and then accuse his target of employing a sockpuppet: 

Zuba <notreal@hotmail.com> wrote in message:
fafmmv$tve$1@news.albasani.net,
> Because of that idiot null who started all of this.  Could you cage
> him?
>
> <laptopia@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1187731956.079349.63870@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> Why is this being discussed in alt.www.webmaster? Was there a meeting
>> I missed?

And here is Mike Dean, answering his own sockpuppet within 20 minutes. Not real subtle:

nullified <null@null.null> wrote in message:
l2omc3h9k3r2r7jk2h4o8ak8l1j19v5jv3@4ax.com,
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:50:32 -0500, "Zuba" <notreal@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Because of that idiot null who started all of this.
>>
> The idiot is you, Red. Because YOU'RE the one who crossposted the
> thread between the groups.
>
>> Could you cage him?
>
> I'm almost disappointed - I thought from your recount of the ASCP
> battles that you saved the day single-handed, and here you are asking
> for help :o)

Mike Dean attempts to justify his stalking

Newsgroup members have made it clear on numerous occasions that Mike Dean's stalking is not welcome. Here he responds to some negative comments about his stalking after he had been behaving like a raving lunatic:  

> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:28:03 -0800 (PST), trisha f
> <plfrei...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Actually, I find it quite annoying, as well as indicative of some
>> mental instability on your own part.

Gigglz <Fre...@Hotmail.com> wrote:
> I hear ya, T.
> I'm not in here much...for such reasons.

On Jan 28, 3:49 am, null@null.null wrote:
> You worry me more than a little with your concept that someone who
> complains tirelessly about unlawful persecution must suffer from a
> mental illness, however.

Ah, so that's what he's doing. He's not stalking. He is just complaining "tirelessly about unlawful persecution." And the "unlawful persecution" he is referring to is this web site. However this web site would not exist if Mike Dean hadn't spent more than 6 years trolling the webmaster newsgroup defending spammers. And if he hadn't tried to destroy someone's business with false allegations of pedophilia. And if he hadn't started stalking me after I objected to those vile accusations.

Shortly after I started this web site in response to his stalking, Mike Dean put up a web page about me on a free blog. Then he put up a second web page on a different free blog. But that hasn't been enough to satisfy his lust for revenge. He dogs my newsgroup posts with outrageous lies about me, and pathetic attempts to convince everyone that I am (as he puts it) a "psychotic obsessive nutter with a grudge." Nice bit of "projection" there. And he is constantly posting my name and address, as well as the url to his web page about me. He does all of this while at the same time claiming that it is justified because this web site victimizes him.

I don't see what he posts unless someone else quotes it, because I have my newsreader set to filter his trash. I don't argue with him, challenge his lies about me or post the url to this web site. All I've done is put up this web site after he started stalking me.

Apparently, in the demented mind of Mike Dean none of his sick behavior constitutes "unlawful persecution" but a web site that documents his stalking does. Such is the abject hypocrisy and circular logic of a mentally ill cyberstalker.

On Jan 31, 9:23 am, null@null.null wrote:
Can you REALLY be *that* fookin stupid? I'm RETALIATING! Since you're
patently too damned thick to understand that I suggest you look it
up. xxxxx publishes material about me, all is (according to your
model) right with the world. I respond, and I'm being "Immature and
childish". I've attempted to be patient with your utterly misguided
crap but unfortunately it seems that you're terminally stupid.

Here's another exchange with a newsgroup member who complained about his stalking:

"nully" <null@null.null> wrote in message
news:xkEtj.579$%W6.56@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
Dear retard, You appear to be suffering from halucinations. Have you
considered not posting to usenet until normal service is resumed? Or
*is* this normal service for you?

Joe_Z wrote:
Should we expect anything more or better from you than this? ok, we
get the picture trolly, try getting a life pasted Juba's kook list
WHY don't ya, sheee, kids never grow up, now we really know who the
kooks are thanks for clearing that up for us, Juba I hope your
rolling on the floor :)....

"nully" <null@null.null> wrote in message 
news:u3Ftj.905$Ef1.793@newsfe6-win.ntli.net...
Yawn... Got some chronic pain? I hope its fuckin' killin' ya. HAND :o)

---------------------------------

Mike Dean is definitely obsessed with this web site. Here are his stats for the month of October 2007, when this site only consisted of one page: